-
MoneyBeGreen ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
7216 votes total - (10376)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
DuckInTheDesert
- 5 stars Rating: 85
728 votes total - (1488)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
DuckInTheDesert
- 5 stars Rating: 85
728 votes total - (1488)
- 31 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Bowerz101 ●
- 5 stars Rating: 93
1453 votes total - Tiny Baby Jesus
- (1152)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
Max Williams ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
441 votes total - Max Williams
- (1929)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
LetMeSeeYourO
- 5 stars Rating: 93
3902 votes total - (6581)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MoneyBeGreen ●
- 5 stars Rating: 91
7216 votes total - (10376)
- 29 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
-
MedDuck said...
Let me get this straight: the average gpa is 2.94...or about a C, or about average. Go figure.
And one more thing. They are comparing grades to say 2006 when Oregon had a worse record in football. Who's to say that a winning football team hasn't attracted a high quality student over the past year who has raised the bar for some of the older students, lowering the overall average? Or that UO hasn't made made a concerted effort to lower grade inflation since then? Or who knows what else? Correlation does not equal causation, my friends.
Max Williams ●
- 5 stars Rating: 97
441 votes total - Max Williams
- (1929)
- 32 months
- Send Message
- Follow User
- Ignore User
- 5 stars
just thought it was interesting during the dead period!














Thanks
Grades and football