Online Now 322

Autzen Audibles

Loudest board in the nation, per capita

On this Board 237
Record: 5214 (1/16/2013)

Online now 396
Record: 5583 (1/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Autzen Audibles

Loudest board in the nation, per capita

Quacks Open Off-Topic Board

The Ticket Exchange

Buy and sell your Duck tickets here.

Reply

Jack changes things up

  • DuckLucky said...

    Takes 1hr to get past McCord/Ft.Lewis. I'm driving to Tacoma for a funeral this weekend.. Hate the drive. Did you really think we had a legit chance signing Jack?

    We did have him scheduled for his last visit. Thats usually an indicator of success.

    mr_griff

  • BornADuck said...

    While I have no inside knowledge, any kid that says he is "not feeling the love from the staff" is probably either not a good fit with our team or the staff has simply decided to not pursue him. Don't believe for a moment that it was due to a lack of effort by the coaches.

    I have to agree with this, remember Pellum was showing Jack love back when it was a two team race between UCLA and UO. Jack was hoping for a Georgia offer that never came.

    Now FSU jumps in last minute? Sounds a bit like Castro last year and Gabe King the year (or two?) before. We did just fine w/o them.

    I have no idea what Jack is like, but the Ducks have been there from the start, if that's not enough love, well that's the way it goes with some PSAs.

    SouthOfTheBorderDuck

  • Also, it's not like Chip's past classes were bad and he had to make mountains out of molehills. As Green & Yellow posted in another thread, Chip's classes have been ranked #32 (his first year, Bellotti turnover), but then #13, #9 and #16. Plus the final two Bellotti classes were #11 and #19.

    This year is ranked #44. Hard not to envision a dropoff when you're not even pulling in a top-40 class, and that's what has me worried, not the results of the past few years, because every single class that Chip has had since he's been here has been ranked far higher than this one.

    This post was edited by MoneyBeGreen on 1/15/2013 at 2:46 PM

    MoneyBeGreen

  • DC_DUCK said...

    YEAH BIG BOY!!!!!

    DROPPIN THE MATCH IN DRY GRASS!!!!!!

    i love it

    Nice Post. Still smilin. .

    DuckLucky

  • mr_griff said...

    We did have him scheduled for his last visit. Thats usually an indicator of success.

    Yah but not in this doogs case. Rubbed our face in it. My all husky hatred showing. Chip tried. I give him credit. I just felt deep inside no way was he honest just pulling Ducks and Chips chain.

    DuckLucky

  • MoneyBeGreen said...

    Also, it's not like Chip's past classes were bad and he had to make mountains out of molehills. As Green & Yellow posted in another thread, Chip's classes have been ranked #32 (his first year, Bellotti turnover), but then #13, #9 and #16. Plus the final two Bellotti classes were #11 and #19.

    This year is ranked #44. Hard not to envision a dropoff when you're not even pulling in a top-40 class, and that's what has me worried, not the results of the past few years, because every single class that Chip has had since he's been here has been ranked far higher than this one.

    hate the say but our 3.38 Rivals star average puts us somewhere around 15th... so really the argument needs to be that we aren't taking enough numbers not that the quality isn't there...

    DC_DUCK

  • SouthOfTheBorderDuck said...

    I have to agree with this, remember Pellum was showing Jack love back when it was a two team race between UCLA and UO. Jack was hoping for a Georgia offer that never came.

    Now FSU jumps in last minute? Sounds a bit like Castro last year and Gabe King the year (or two?) before. We did just fine w/o them.

    I have no idea what Jack is like, but the Ducks have been there from the start, if that's not enough love, well that's the way it goes with some PSAs.

    "We did just fine w/o them." You nailed it Southie! Will be top 5 without Jack.

    DuckLucky

  • MoneyBeGreen said...

    Two examples. You say Brown and Pryor, I say Werner and Keenan Allen.

    Yes, but by all accounts Werner was 100% due to location, which is the point of many posters, some guys are just out of the coaches control. Allen required a scholarship for his bro, which is not the Ducks style these days.

    SouthOfTheBorderDuck

  • DC_DUCK said...

    hate the say but our 3.38 Rivals star average puts us somewhere around 15th... so really the argument needs to be that we aren't taking enough numbers not that the quality isn't there...

    Yeah our star rating is nice, but we're whiffing hard on positions of need which isn't related to star rating.

    MoneyBeGreen

  • MoneyBeGreen said...

    Yeah our star rating is nice, but we're whiffing hard on positions of need which isn't related to star rating.

    this is true. according to 247 we are 25th re: average and 2nd in PAC-12 behind SC, which is #1.

    filling positions of need and program fit are clearly important. but the numbers are a bit misleading and a lot of top teams a beyond full... that theoretically puts us in a good poaching position by making the position of need argument.

    DC_DUCK

  • MoneyBeGreen said...

    Also, it's not like Chip's past classes were bad and he had to make mountains out of molehills. As Green & Yellow posted in another thread, Chip's classes have been ranked #32 (his first year, Bellotti turnover), but then #13, #9 and #16. Plus the final two Bellotti classes were #11 and #19.

    This year is ranked #44. Hard not to envision a dropoff when you're not even pulling in a top-40 class, and that's what has me worried, not the results of the past few years, because every single class that Chip has had since he's been here has been ranked far higher than this one.

    Yeah finishing there would be very, very bad. But if we go by ave star rating I'd be happy to make an avatar bet that we finish top 20. Overall I'll wager we still crack top 25, which the program can weather if that includes the beginnings of scholarship reductions.

    SouthOfTheBorderDuck

  • MoneyBeGreen said...

    They play by their own rules, but at what point do you question if those rules are giving you the best results for sustained success?

    When the team starts losing, imo.

    I don't get why fans are more worried with recruiting off the field than wins on it. Sometimes I think our fan base would rather us be Texas or FSU pulling in 5 stars but losing games.

    ducklefty

  • SouthOfTheBorderDuck said...

    Yeah finishing there would be very, very bad. But if we go by ave star rating I'd be happy to make an avatar bet that we finish top 20. Overall I'll wager we still crack top 25, which the program can weather if that includes the beginnings of scholarship reductions.

    I'll back that bet SOTB.

    Bottom line is that we are a very young team starting as many as 15 fresh/soph this year and our 2 and 3 deep got lots of PT. We are going to be fine and I will not take offense at any claim that things could or even should be better.

    'Visor' & Co. better tighten it up and close hard!

    DC_DUCK

  • MoneyBeGreen said...

    Also, it's not like Chip's past classes were bad and he had to make mountains out of molehills. As Green & Yellow posted in another thread, Chip's classes have been ranked #32 (his first year, Bellotti turnover), but then #13, #9 and #16. Plus the final two Bellotti classes were #11 and #19.

    This year is ranked #44. Hard not to envision a dropoff when you're not even pulling in a top-40 class, and that's what has me worried, not the results of the past few years, because every single class that Chip has had since he's been here has been ranked far higher than this one.

    This is right on the money. None of the people who are banging on Chip right now are saying why didnt we offer this guy, or why not that guy. The problem is we are losing the recruiting battles we are engaged in and the theme over and over and over and over and over, is that the staff cooled or didn't show them enough love, or waited too long. Take Jaynard Bostwick. He is being recruited by all the biggest schools in the country. Every interview he gave put Oregon in his top 3-5 school despite not havingt an offer. This continued on for 6 months until close to December or a little after, and then we decide to offer?!?! If he lacked the character or skillset to play for us why did we offer when we did? Does anyone think we're going to battle head to head with Alabama and Florida by offering 6 months late? We've bungled this class. Its an irrefutable fact barring a drastic close to this class. I say drastic because we don't have enough offers out there to reasonable expect a class keeping with the last 3 years.

    To reiterate I have no problem with us using a different method for evaluating talent. It has worked spledidly well so far. Its our method of securing them and their recruitment that has been highly suspect this year. The mods all have the same take, its been a weird year and the plan seems to be changing all the time. Im not sure you can have followed this year and not come to the conclusion that something needs to be better next year. Either offers have to go out earlier, the net needs to be wider, or the kids they choose to go after need to receive more focus. You can make the case against any one of those given our philosophy and why its a bad idea, but a small group of offers, many of which are too late and a Lassez Faire approach has left us with a class that needs a lot of help to finish where we have been finishing.

    mr_griff

  • ducklefty said...

    When the team starts losing, imo.

    I don't get why fans are more worried with recruiting off the field than wins on it. Sometimes I think our fan base would rather us be Texas or FSU pulling in 5 stars but losing games.

    They do that because they have crappy coaches who can't teach the slightest bit of humility. Bama piles on 5-star guys and wins 3 out of 4 nattys. LSU does it and wins constantly. USC under Carroll did. Oklahoma usually does. Great coaches turn that talent into results. Chip's not Mack Brown, Lane Kiffin or Jimbo Fisher. He's on a different universe, and humility and unification under one mindset are his prime traits.

    This post was edited by MoneyBeGreen on 1/15/2013 at 3:11 PM

    MoneyBeGreen

  • DC_DUCK said...

    hate the say but our 3.38 Rivals star average puts us somewhere around 15th... so really the argument needs to be that we aren't taking enough numbers not that the quality isn't there...

    We will have a hard time maintaining that average with what is on our board if we intend to take more than 2 or 3 more kids. If we only end up taking 16 PSA and close with a couple of solid players I would concede your point in full.

    mr_griff

  • mr_griff said...

    This is right on the money. None of the people who are banging on Chip right now are saying why didnt we offer this guy, or why not that guy. The problem is we are losing the recruiting battles we are engaged in and the theme over and over and over and over and over, is that the staff cooled or didn't show them enough love, or waited too long. Take Jaynard Bostwick. He is being recruited by all the biggest schools in the country. Every interview he gave put Oregon in his top 3-5 school despite not havingt an offer. This continued on for 6 months until close to December or a little after, and then we decide to offer?!?! If he lacked the character or skillset to play for us why did we offer when we did? Does anyone think we're going to battle head to head with Alabama and Florida by offering 6 months late? We've bungled this class. Its an irrefutable fact barring a drastic close to this class. I say drastic because we don't have enough offers out there to reasonable expect a class keeping with the last 3 years.

    To reiterate I have no problem with us using a different method for evaluating talent. It has worked spledidly well so far. Its our method of securing them and their recruitment that has been highly suspect this year. The mods all have the same take, its been a weird year and the plan seems to be changing all the time. Im not sure you can have followed this year and not come to the conclusion that something needs to be better next year. Either offers have to go out earlier, the net needs to be wider, or the kids they choose to go after need to receive more focus. You can make the case against any one of those given our philosophy and why its a bad idea, but a small group of offers, many of which are too late and a Lassez Faire approach has left us with a class that needs a lot of help to finish where we have been finishing.

    seriously sick of this BS. we are avg. 16th in rivals in avg. star ranking. it's a small class, we are a young team and it has been a weird year... and guess what its not over.

    define "bungling this class"... is having a 3.38 star rating somehow f'ed up to you?

    we are .10 BEHIND Georgia, Texas A&M, Florida State, Clemson and AHEAD of Stanford, South Carolina, Oklahoma

    Texas is 3rd with a class size of 13 and an avg. rating of 3.77

    Looks to me like we are getting quality kids with room for more in the next three weeks. It's easy to make offers to kids you have never met or spoken to, whose film you've never seen. I have no perspective as to what should or shouldn't be happening in these situations. I love our class so far. It is consistent, quality wise (to the extent we care about stars and y/y rankings), with what we've seen in the past.

    2013 - 3.38 currently (16th avg. stars) and ??????????????
    2012 - finished 3.38 (15th avg. stars) and 16th overall but we took 21 kids
    2011 - finished 3.57 (8th avg. stars) and 9th overall with 23 kids
    2010 - finished 3.39 (14th avg. stars) and 15th overall with 23 kids
    2009 - finished 2.92 (42nd avg. stars) and 32nd overall with 26 kids

    DC_DUCK

  • This post is for members of DuckTerritory only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/JHopkins247

    Justin Hopkins

  • This post is for members of DuckTerritory only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    DC_DUCK

  • DC_DUCK said...

    seriously sick of this BS. we are avg. 16th in rivals in avg. star ranking. it's a small class, we are a young team and it has been a weird year... and guess what its not over.

    define "bungling this class"... is having a 3.38 star rating somehow f'ed up to you?

    we are .10 BEHIND Georgia, Texas A&M, Florida State, Clemson and AHEAD of Stanford, South Carolina, Oklahoma

    Texas is 3rd with a class size of 13 and an avg. rating of 3.77

    Looks to me like we are getting quality kids with room for more in the next three weeks. It's easy to make offers to kids you have never met or spoken to, whose film you've never seen. I have no perspective as to what should or shouldn't be happening in these situations. I love our class so far. It is consistent, quality wise (to the extent we care about stars and y/y rankings), with what we've seen in the past.

    2013 - 3.38 currently (16th avg. stars) and ?????????????? 2012 - finished 3.38 (15th avg. stars) and 16th overall but we took 21 kids 2011 - finished 3.57 (8th avg. stars) and 9th overall with 23 kids 2010 - finished 3.39 (14th avg. stars) and 15th overall with 23 kids 2009 - finished 2.92 (42nd avg. stars) and 32nd overall with 26 kids

    Warning: Caps! But not for shouting, just so you actually understand the emphasis :D

    Sunshine Pumpers:

    You don't seem to get what the problem is from what I've read on this thread.

    In this class, there was a HUGE need at OL and LB.

    Last year, there was a HUGE need at OL. They didn't take a single HS Olineman.

    This year, they got one guy at OL that was on their board. Brenner and Pisarcik, while they may turn out to be fine players, WERE NOT HIGH ON THEIR BOARD.

    The coaches are scrambling. Yes. They absolutely, positively see the same need at OL that we do. The two deep is scary thin. Have you seen it? They need guys to come in and compete as true freshmen. Look at the mods' posts. They are in just as much disbelief as MoneyBeGreen, without his reaction.

    At LB, they've done a bit better, as they've added three quality guys that were actually on their board. Yes, LB is a HUGE need. Huge. They need a guy to come in, maybe two guys, to compete at MIKE for THIS COMING SEASON.

    Problem is, past recruits have not worked out there. Wallace is gone. Garrick is a mystery. Hardrick has been injured for two years straight.

    Maybe the class average is okay. Maybe it's not that big of a deal in the long run. But they are missing the guys on their board big time at OL and LB and the team will feel that starting next year and continuing in the coming two or three years.

    Don't believe me, ask the mods. Good grief.

    Thanks for listening and enjoy your day.

    They need

    Natty_Dread

  • This post is for members of DuckTerritory only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    USC is like a german car, every piece that breaks is of the highest quality.

    AvroDuck

  • Natty_Dread said...

    Warning: Caps! But not for shouting, just so you actually understand the emphasis :D

    Sunshine Pumpers:

    You don't seem to get what the problem is from what I've read on this thread.

    In this class, there was a HUGE need at OL and LB.

    Last year, there was a HUGE need at OL. They didn't take a single HS Olineman.

    This year, they got one guy at OL that was on their board. Brenner and Pisarcik, while they may turn out to be fine players, WERE NOT HIGH ON THEIR BOARD.

    The coaches are scrambling. Yes. They absolutely, positively see the same need at OL that we do. The two deep is scary thin. Have you seen it? They need guys to come in and compete as true freshmen. Look at the mods' posts. They are in just as much disbelief as MoneyBeGreen, without his reaction.

    At LB, they've done a bit better, as they've added three quality guys that were actually on their board. Yes, LB is a HUGE need. Huge. They need a guy to come in, maybe two guys, to compete at MIKE for THIS COMING SEASON.

    Problem is, past recruits have not worked out there. Wallace is gone. Garrick is a mystery. Hardrick has been injured for two years straight.

    Maybe the class average is okay. Maybe it's not that big of a deal in the long run. But they are missing the guys on their board big time at OL and LB and the team will feel that starting next year and continuing in the coming two or three years.

    Don't believe me, ask the mods. Good grief.

    Thanks for listening and enjoy your day.

    They need

    Natty... respect. i hear ya on the whiffs and needs. No pumping going on over here... btw where the hell is my wife. Hell i even upvoted you peace

    DC_DUCK

  • This post is for members of DuckTerritory only. Join now! Subscribe Now

    DC_DUCK

  • Natty_Dread said...

    Warning: Caps! But not for shouting, just so you actually understand the emphasis :D

    Sunshine Pumpers:

    You don't seem to get what the problem is from what I've read on this thread.

    In this class, there was a HUGE need at OL and LB.

    Last year, there was a HUGE need at OL. They didn't take a single HS Olineman.

    This year, they got one guy at OL that was on their board. Brenner and Pisarcik, while they may turn out to be fine players, WERE NOT HIGH ON THEIR BOARD.

    The coaches are scrambling. Yes. They absolutely, positively see the same need at OL that we do. The two deep is scary thin. Have you seen it? They need guys to come in and compete as true freshmen. Look at the mods' posts. They are in just as much disbelief as MoneyBeGreen, without his reaction.

    At LB, they've done a bit better, as they've added three quality guys that were actually on their board. Yes, LB is a HUGE need. Huge. They need a guy to come in, maybe two guys, to compete at MIKE for THIS COMING SEASON.

    Problem is, past recruits have not worked out there. Wallace is gone. Garrick is a mystery. Hardrick has been injured for two years straight.

    Maybe the class average is okay. Maybe it's not that big of a deal in the long run. But they are missing the guys on their board big time at OL and LB and the team will feel that starting next year and continuing in the coming two or three years.

    Don't believe me, ask the mods. Good grief.

    Thanks for listening and enjoy your day.

    They need

    Re: OLine wiffs and 2-star recruits, here's a post from yesterday:

    There have been some very good points made in this thread and I think there are some unrealistic expectations by some fans. Would you rather have the Honey Badger or TMitch? Or how about Cliffy or TMitch? Give me TMitch any day. Players who can't play aren't very useful.
    So Chip took a hard line and guess what, every player in the past 3 years has qualified. Off the field problems? Dropped considerably.
    Now OLine specifically, 2011:
    Fischer - Plays as a true Frosh. Starts as a true Soph.
    Johnstone - starting LT as a rFr! And because of skill, not desperation!
    Euscher - 2 star that was solid as a backup by the end of rFr year, not common!
    Andre Y - completely reshaped his body and looks to be on the right path.
    Prater - still needs to improve.
    Going into this year we were about 9 deep on the OLine, pretty hard to recruit when even a stud like Kyle Long with an NFL body can barely crack the 2-deep at first. You say just wait a year? Well we have 4 starters that are Soph or Juniors (Grasu, Stevens, Fischer, Johnstone) and at least those two above in the mix for time. Add in the Seniors Greg and Benyard and again you're 8 deep and only two spots open up for the 2014 2-deep not counting Prater's development.
    That can be intimidating to a 17 y/o who really wants to play, not to mention looking at your own class and seeing Voeller already committed. And yet I still think the Ducks pull another stud or two this class. With the way Euscher looked, I'm even more willing to give Coach 'Wood some leeway, until he proves me wrong, the man knows OLine talent.

    Oh and Unger, never forget Unger!

    SouthOfTheBorderDuck

  • FWIW, I think the assistants gave him a decent amount of attention, but he wasn't getting any from Chip. Very confusing to me. However, as some here have mentioned, we weren't getting Myles either way IMO.

    This post was edited by Max Williams on 1/15/2013 at 4:08 PM

    signature image

    Check out All Comedy 1450 http://www.facebook.com/AllComedyRadio1450 https://twitter.com/AllComedy1450

    Max Williams