Online Now 1286

Autzen Audibles

Loudest board in the nation, per capita

On this Board 949
Record: 5214 (1/16/2013)

Online now 1283
Record: 5583 (1/22/2012)

Boards ▾

Autzen Audibles

Loudest board in the nation, per capita

Quacks Open Off-Topic Board

The Ticket Exchange

Buy and sell your Duck tickets here.

Reply

Pisarcik details his Oregon pledge

  • http://oregon.247sports.com/Article/Jake-Pisarcik-details-Oregon-commit-position-and-the-process-107603

    Oregon fans got a shock when Jake Pisarcik committed to Oregon last night. He shed some light on how he got his offer, his commitment and when he will visit Eugene.

    Follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/JHopkins247

    Justin Hopkins

  • Thanks Justin. Sounds like a kid who is willing to work to perfect his craft. Nice pick up.

    ducklefty

  • I'm a star chaser, I won't lie, but that's only because generally they are rated a certain way for a reason. This kid is a beast and I would even call it a sexy commitment. He doesn't wait for players to come to him he meets them an drives them where he wants them to go.

    Back in Quack

  • Back in Quack said...

    I'm a star chaser, I won't lie, but that's only because generally they are rated a certain way for a reason. This kid is a beast and I would even call it a sexy commitment. He doesn't wait for players to come to him he meets them an drives them where he wants them to go.

    Star chaser means you believe in the system.
    These guys rank him a 2 star the hundred and something OG this year. Will he be your one exception?

    AngryDuck

  • AngryDuck said...

    Star chaser means you believe in the system.
    These guys rank him a 2 star the hundred and something OG this year. Will he be your one exception?

    Grrrrrrr my name is angry duck and I am here to stir it up!

    This post was edited by Justin Hopkins on 12/20/2012 at 11:03 AM

    Back in Quack

  • Truth hurts man, truly does.

    This post was edited by Justin Hopkins on 12/20/2012 at 11:03 AM

    AngryDuck

  • "I love the tradition and the winning program. I'm honored to play for Oregon."

    I could give two sh*ts if he was a 2 star. That statement is what I care about.

    This post was edited by Duck Nasty on 12/19/2012 at 8:45 PM

    signature image signature image signature image

    Duck Nasty

  • AngryDuck said...

    Truth hurts man, truly does.

    No Angry Duck, the truth doesn't hurt. What hurts is thinking you live in a world of absolutes. The world is not black and white, there are various shades of gray. You can both believe in the ranking system as a barometer of talent, and still believe the system is not infallible. Even the talent evaluators would admit they make oversights or even errors evaluating talent. You are just a curmudgeon, who has led himself to believe there are not multiple ways at looking at the same prospect.

    Duckwad

  • Duckwad said...

    No Angry Duck, the truth doesn't hurt. What hurts is thinking you live in a world of absolutes. The world is not black and white, there are various shades of gray. You can both believe in the ranking system as a barometer of talent, and still believe the system is not infallible. Even the talent evaluators would admit they make oversights or even errors evaluating talent. You are just a curmudgeon, who has led himself to believe there are not multiple ways at looking at the same prospect.

    I'm betting you lost him at absolutes. He's think you're talking about vodka for rich folks.

    mr_griff

  • Again like I posted earlier this year - Eddie George was not rated at all "0 star", and ended up winning the Heisman. Star rating are based on a lot of things including how many camps a kid goes to... There are a lot of 5 stars that have flamed out... A lot of teams loaded with 5 stars flame out.. We offered Mariota before he every QB's a high school game. I think our coaches are professional coaches for a reason... They have made stars out of kids who came in under the radar...

    signature image

    Enjoy Life, it has an expiration date.

    duckdeb

  • mr_griff said...

    I'm betting you lost him at absolutes. He's think you're talking about vodka for rich folks.

    It's hard to keep track of all the "AngryDucks" on this site.

    Duckwad

  • The Big Ten (soon to be 14) announced their all conference team. 8 of the 22 starters were reported to be two stars or less. Those that make it in the NFL are often two stars or less, particularly O-linemen. Stars are given prior to the junior year and tend to get adjusted based upon the summer camps after that year. There are a ton of late bloomers and I think the Ducks got one with Jake P.

    Remembering back to the seven person O-line class of Klovas, Hucko, Schwartz, Kendall, Lewis, Unger and Asper ... the stars turned out to almost be inversely correlated to their success as Ducks.

    This post was edited by johnch on 12/19/2012 at 9:26 PM

    johnch

  • The point being Back in Quack isn't really a star chaser, he's gung ho about all Oregon commits, see his comments the lowly ranked Walker as well. Which is fine. But one shouldn't go I'm a star chaser but love this guy.

    First of all it questions the reliability of calling ones self a star chaser vs. the other option of just being pro duck. You are putting a distinction of being for this site above the general gung ho attitude. That one is superior because one follows the high star recruits and has discerning taste between how good different ones are.

    The implication is that you are saying this new recruit is good or as good as many of the highly ranked players you follow closely because you follow them closely and know these things. But when you say all these xxx players are awesome without ranking them it somewhat invalidates your point.

    I'm all for being for players who want to be ducks. But claiming your a star chaser and then going gung-ho that the lower ranked duck recruits are awesome is some flawed perspective.

    Now it is possible to be this way and to be right, if all the duck players are homeruns in the long run, but the truth is some of the players we recruit will be misses. That would be true if we had a class of all 5 and 4 stars and one of all 3 and two stars. That is because there are only so much starting time that can be given to players.

    I am for all players that want to be ducks, but I can't say that all players we get who commit will be awesome all Americian starters, or even starters on the team.

    Say you love that guy great, I like this OL recruit because we've found strength in TE converted OL in our scheme. I'm not going to say I like this guy because I'm a star watcher, and despite his low ranking I think he is special.

    AngryDuck

  • AngryDuck said...

    The point being Back in Quack isn't really a star chaser, he's gung ho about all Oregon commits, see his comments the lowly ranked Walker as well. Which is fine. But one shouldn't go I'm a star chaser but love this guy.

    First of all it questions the reliability of calling ones self a star chaser vs. the other option of just being pro duck. You are putting a distinction of being for this site above the general gung ho attitude. That one is superior because one follows the high star recruits and has discerning taste between how good different ones are.

    The implication is that you are saying this new recruit is good or as good as many of the highly ranked players you follow closely because you follow them closely and know these things. But when you say all these xxx players are awesome without ranking them it somewhat invalidates your point.

    I'm all for being for players who want to be ducks. But claiming your a star chaser and then going gung-ho that the lower ranked duck recruits are awesome is some flawed perspective.

    Now it is possible to be this way and to be right, if all the duck players are homeruns in the long run, but the truth is some of the players we recruit will be misses. That would be true if we had a class of all 5 and 4 stars and one of all 3 and two stars. That is because there are only so much starting time that can be given to players.

    I am for all players that want to be ducks, but I can't say that all players we get who commit will be awesome all Americian starters, or even starters on the team.

    Say you love that guy great, I like this OL recruit because we've found strength in TE converted OL in our scheme. I'm not going to say I like this guy because I'm a star watcher, and despite his low ranking I think he is special.

    You are an idiot. You would actually take the time. See my comments about us not offering or pursuing top ranked players. You are picking parts out to "help" your argument and it still sucks.

    Back in Quack

  • Back in Quack said...

    You are an idiot. You would actually take the time. See my comments about us not offering or pursuing top ranked players. You are picking parts out to "help" your argument and it still sucks.

    Name a duck commit this class you don't like because you are a Star watcher and why, prove your discerning taste.

    This post was edited by AngryDuck on 12/19/2012 at 9:41 PM

    AngryDuck

  • Seisay. I think we offered him way too early and are basically turning guys like redfield down. I wante to go after te Fresno boys lj Moore and Johnny Johnson. Happy now tool? Also not sold on voeller at all

    This post has been edited 2 times, most recently by Back in Quack on 12/19/2012 at 9:57 PM

    Back in Quack

  • Back in Quack said...

    Seisay. I think we offered him way too early and are basically turning guys like redfield down. I wante to go after te Fresno boys ln Moore and Johnny Johnson. Happy now tool? Also not sold on voeller at all

    Actually yes, that does make me feel better.

    AngryDuck

  • AngryDuck said...

    Actually yes, that does make me feel better.

    You have a sad life. Really really sad.

    Back in Quack

  • Back in Quack said...

    You have a sad life. Really really sad.

    Says the star watcher.

    AngryDuck

  • AngryDuck said...

    Says the star watcher.

    Says the stalker

    Back in Quack

  • ignoring recruiting rankings is like saying I'm going to pass on my 1st round pick in the NFL draft and wait until the 5th because that was the round Tom Brady was drafted.

    matmik

  • matmik said...

    ignoring recruiting rankings is like saying I'm going to pass on my 1st round pick in the NFL draft and wait until the 5th because that was the round Tom Brady was drafted.

    Shhh.... they'll get you now.

    AngryDuck

  • Back in Quack said...

    Seisay. I think we offered him way too early and are basically turning guys like redfield down. I wante to go after te Fresno boys lj Moore and Johnny Johnson. Happy now tool? Also not sold on voeller at all

    LOL

    nlonden

  • This board is just too damn contentious ... we're all Ducks ... Geez ...

    MacMallard1

  • Plus one Mac

    Happyvduck